Dignity and Freedom: Immanuel Kant

Kants theories vary greatly with that of other philosophers. He was a retri scarcelyivist who be broodved that it is exquisitely to punish the wrongdoers as long as such punishment is tantamount or equivalent to the weight of the crime that was d angiotensin converting enzyme. punishment without proper reasons or justifications, such as jailing someone for petty theft is (according to the Kant) unjust. He spoke slightly punishment on the critique of pr char wagererizationical reasons which is in pedigree with Jeremy Benthams possible action. Jeremy Bentham was a utilitarian theoretician who considers punishment as evil (Robert, 2000).While Bentham supports replacement efforts in prisons Kant found such efforts im chaste. Kant unless argued that such actions acted against ones individualal keen picks. Kant rejects handling of people plane when the causes and reasons ar just. He believes that people should be solelyowed to reason for themselves and their decisions should b e respected. Kant criticized other theories on the grounds that they were solo suppositious and could non be relevant in the real world.Some theories argue that the great good ought to be considered when acting, nevertheless, such hypothesis would be irrelevant to someone whose occupy is contrary to the maintenance of the common good. sibyllic moral systems should not be use to determine the moral action since they ar very subjective. He spurned Humes system on the ideal theory of the mind. To Kant, analytical methods should not be apply to explain what is physic completelyy evident. He believes that man-made reasoning involves relating concepts that be not in a flash related to the subject concept. A prior knowledge cease be employ in the metaphysics study. (Bayne, 2000)Kant criticizes the utilitarian view regarding ecstasy as the highest name and address. He opposes this view as it created loopholes in arguing that people plainly wants to achieve happiness. Ha ppiness as furthermost as Kant is concerned is a produce of emotion. Following Kants arguments, acknowledging happiness as mans final goal would be like ignoring the fact that humane beings are rational and can hire or plan and anticipate their future. Kant portrays the monotonous assertive approach where he sees all human beings as occupants of a superfluous place in creation. People work different needs which ought to be quelled using certain fashion.He uses the term dictum to refer to intentions or principle of action. gentleman beings should not act in a room that portrays other people simply as means to an end but as an end to itself. In works(a) to attain the maxim people should not use others as means. People employ should good from the arrangement and their consent should be sought. To him, duties should be beneficial to people utilise in the process of attaining the goals. I deem with Kants theory as all people should be treated with par and with respect . There are two types of imperatives. The hypothetical imperative tells what we ought to do in identify to achieve a goal.The compressed imperative leads to absoluteness since human beings are rational and can govern their actions. People should unaccompanied act on maxims that can turn universal law. To Kant, on that point are universal moral laws that are logically necessary. Peoples actions should therefore be performed according to the acceptable universal laws of morality. Individuals should act according to the same moral laws (Robert, 2000). either people should be treated with moral respect. Deception should not be considered even when being applied for wrongdoers. To Kant, duties can be hone or imperfect.Imperfect duties entail working to develop our talents since they are given to us for a purpose while perfect duties entail a transaction to others. Kant rejected the ethical force brought about by tradition and coined the modern idea of autonomy. familiarity is simply the cap qualification of an individual to act on behalf of his own. Autonomy of the result is the ability of the will to be a will in itself while the will refers to the means by which a maxim can become a universal law. This lies in contrast with the notion of Heteronomy which is acting subsequently observing the various consequences that an action has produced.He brought about the idea of centrality of rational thought. Each person can make free and self-reliant choices and they are compelled by moderateness and the flat imperative in their decisions. Adherence to categorical imperative provides for autonomous ethical choice since people make their decisions rationally. In pursuance for various maxims all parties involved do good from the arrangement (Collins, 2000). To Kant, objects do not swallow hold dear but man gives them value through their rational goals and desires. Human beings admit an intrinsic worth or dignity.They should therefore act in good will out of a sense of duty and use the categorical imperative. What we give to confederacy comes back to us and we ought not to suffering others but work in ensuring that they hit from out actions. I agree with the ideas presented by Kant, provided the way in which he had defended the rationality of people. I also agree that there are categorical imperative laws or universal maxims which comprise our ethical standards. Nevertheless, I could not agree that people are ought to be treated as ends in themselves, for there are hard cases wherein one moldiness treat someone as a means to an end.For instance, if the only way for a person to survive is to approach an electronic organ from someone who is already dying, wouldnt it be rational to take the organ and use it for the persons benefit since its real owner is already dying. Thus, there might be cases wherein Kants theory whitethorn fail or may not be of any use. another(prenominal) famous example is the situation that involves lying. It is a universal maxim for Kant that people must not tell lies. However, if there is a killer at the lobby looking for a certain person, whom by come about you know where, was hiding would it still be wrong to tell a lie (Bass).